Cf. Mauro Pesce, ed., Le parole dimenticate di Gesu (Milan: Lorenzo Valla-Mondadori, ), J Maria Grazia Mara, II Vangelo di Pietro ( Bologna. Anthropological and Historical Perspectives Adriana Destro, Mauro Pesce Pesce M., a, Le parole dimenticate di Gesù, Milano, Fondazione Lorenzo Valla. Mauro Pesce, Professore Ordinario di Storia del Cristianesimo. Gesù e il movimento post-gesuano: soltanto ebrei. CERCA PAROLE Adriana Destro and Mauro Pesce: The Cultural Structure of the Infancy Narrative in the Gospel of Matthew Mauro Pesce, Francesca Prescendi, François Rosset, Anders Runesson.
|Published (Last):||25 July 2007|
|PDF File Size:||2.52 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||5.44 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
This process naturally raises the question of the extent to which Dionysus constitutes one god or one god among many. Carmen Encinas Reguero analyses the different nuances underlying the names dimenticaate Dionysus in the Bacchae.
Mythos und Kultus Christopher Faraone argues dimenticatte the mythic account of the attack on Dionysus and his nurses furnishes the etiology for initiation into the Dionysiac mysteries in Thrace and Thessaly, with Dionysus serving as the model for male initiates and his nurses for females. After an analysis of the dithyramb’s genre and a discussion of examples drawn from Pindar and Bacchylides, he suggests that it is the poem’s discourse and its modes that ultimately distinguish the dithyramb from other types of poetry such as the paean.
For her part, Giulia Sfameni Gasparro approaches the Orphic Hymns from the perspective of polyonomia dimenticae henotheism.
Mauro Pesce Official Website
Bacchos, by pewce, refers to the destructive side of the god, while Dionysus is the neutral name of the deity. Login Nome utente Password Ricordami Password dimenticata?
Caballero argues persuasively that historical maenads modeled themselves on mythical maenads, particularly those represented in Euripides’ Bacchae. The image they present is that of a majestic deity worthy of Olympos.
Marisa Tortorelli Ghidini addresses an “imbalance” in the relation between Orphism and Dionysiac mystery religion. In addition, Wyler’s Figure Mauro Pesce Official Website.
She therefore stresses the need to consider those theological and ethical features of Orphism that show an indebtedness to the cult of Apollo, and also to Pythagoreanism.
Dionysian iconography is also well served in this volume. Albert Henrichs closes the volume by asking, “Dionysus: Despite the frieze’s poor state of preservation, she concludes that the Dionysiac motifs there and elsewhere are not explicitly religious but contribute dimentifate a solemn ambience characteristic of the Augustan agenda.
If the volume inevitably stops short of a detailed picture, it nevertheless does much to limn the god’s familiar — and unfamiliar — features. Bremmer’s article offers a timely re-evaluation of Otto’s MeisterwerkDionysos.
Even if the book’s direct references to the god are minimal, Dionysus is still viewed as a major contender with Yahweh, and the two are cast as rivals, each of whom can offer salvation and deliverance to his followers.
He stresses the complementarity of the three hymns in their representation and theology of the god, and emphasizes that prior to dramatic portrayals of Dionysus they furnished the most authoritative image of the deity.
Claude Calame investigates the dithyramb and its relation to Dionysus. She determines that despite the absence of an explicit focus on Dionysus, the plays nevertheless reveal a rich variety of the god’s mythic and cultic aspects. Apart from that omission, the book itself is beautifully produced, with high-quality plates and sturdy binding. Except for a preliminary article by Jan Bremmer on Walter Otto and a concluding evaluative summation by Albert Henrichs, the rest of the articles follow a basically chronological format, ranging from the Mycenaeans to the Romans and Late Antiquity, and finishing with Dionysian iconography.
As for the book’s production, there are more than a few solecisms in spelling and grammar — not unexpectedly in a volume where few of the contributors write in their native language — but they rarely affect meanings. In a wide-ranging discussion, he isolates four key forces that he deems relatively constant even if their interactions vary depending on the time and place, namely: Andrea Debiasi examines the Actaeon myth as it is represented a papyrus fragment from Oxyrhynchus P.
Apollo is the god of song and Dionysus is the god of dramatic poetic narrative, but there are frequent overlaps and interactions between the two. No sooner had they put out the fine collection of essays edited by Renate Schlesier, A Different God?
The plunge into the sea did gees simply signify the normal rite of passage to adulthood, but the more fundamental transition from mortality to immortality.
Debiasi, however, makes a detailed case for attributing the fragment dj to Eumelos of Corinth. Finally, Anton Bierl addresses the Dionysus of Old Comedy, both of which he sees as embodying the carnivalesque and involving the interpenetration of Dionysian festivals with comedy. Not surprisingly, a significant portion of the volume is given epsce to Dionysus’ associations with drama. Here, under the influence of late antique syncretism, Dionysus leaves off much of his pagan character and takes on characteristics of Christ, becoming a deity who shows compassion and pity for the sufferings of humans, and dedicates himself to allaying these sufferings.
Two articles usefully ask whether maenadic ecstasy was fact or fiction: His caution is salutary, but while it is true that many facets of the Dionysus figure remain undefined, these essays go some considerable distance in further defining this most elusive of gods.
Ultimi articoli Sette tesi di Storia del Cristianesimo Esegesi dei vangeli? He demonstrates that, far from “having nothing to do with Dionysus,” Old Comedy has a great deal to do with him. Though the two display considerable overlap, some texts, such as Aeschylus’ Bassaridesdocument a clash between Dionysus and Orpheus.
He argues against the supposition that the followers of Dionysus had taken on the name Bacchos to identify with the deity, concluding dimenficate that lf converse is the case: Dionysos and Ancient Polytheism Since there is also no comprehensive bibliography, it is difficult to know if and when a scholar’s work has been cited.