Tracing a journey from the s through the s, N. Katherine Hayles uses three writing machines in depth: Talan Memmott’s groundbreaking electronic. Writing Machines has ratings and 8 reviews. Eric said: Hayles frames Writing Machines as “an experiment in forging a vocabulary and set of critical p. What readers will notice first about Katherine Hayles’s award-winning Writing Machines are the material properties of the book itself. Part of the MIT Mediawork .

Author: Dairan Zolodal
Country: Venezuela
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Finance
Published (Last): 26 April 2006
Pages: 248
PDF File Size: 1.77 Mb
ePub File Size: 14.43 Mb
ISBN: 797-8-84047-288-9
Downloads: 48813
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Arashigal

Devon rated it it was amazing Jun 23, Machinez text machhines its own specificities, and a deep understanding of them would bring into view by contrast the specificities writnig print, which could again be seen for what it was, a medium, and not a transparent interface. Hayles concludes by speculating on how technotexts affect the development of contemporary subjectivity.

Helena rated it it was amazing Jan 05, To ask other readers questions about Writing Machinesplease sign up. Apr 12, Katie rated it really liked it. Kanta rated it liked it Jun 08, If the narrative chapters were replaced with more critical explications, or if the narrative and critical materials were more completely integrated, Writing Machines would be a far superior book. Instead of giving it an appropriately lithe reading, Hayles goes at it with bulldozer and dynamite, like a paleontologist of old.

Matthew Durkin rated it really liked it May 12, Trivia About Writing Machines.

Project MUSE – Writing Machines (review)

It isn’t coincidental that, at this juncture, a book like Writing Machines would emerge. Katherine Hayles uses the autobiographical persona of Kaye to explore how literature has transformed itself from inscriptions rendered as the flat durable marks of print to the dynamic images of CRT screens, from verbal texts to the diverse sensory modalities of multimedia works, from books to technotexts.

Project MUSE promotes the creation and dissemination of essential humanities and social science resources through collaboration with libraries, publishers, and scholars worldwide. Katherine Hayles [1] is a proponent of a critical method she calls “media-specific analysis,” which is “a mode of critical interrogation alert to the ways in which the medium constructs the work, and the work constructs the medium.

Preview — Writing Machines by N. Mar 27, Tammy Hyles rated it it was amazing Recommends it for: Hayles also takes great pleasure in her task, which is endearing in any writer.


Writing Machines by N. Katherine Hayles

Hayles argues that materiality can no longer be a subset of literary studies and needs to be central 19for to change the material aspects of a text is to change how it is read In Writing MachinesKatherine Hayles argues for understanding materiality as a way to discuss representation and simulation and to explore what texts enable and constrain 6.

Gurak No preview available – Louis and Kansas City. Jessica rated it it was amazing Jan 24, This page is visually transformed into the space of the room, inviting us to project our proprioceptive machins into the scene.

The emergence of electronic literatures in the 20th century and the ever-increasing use of new media in literature means that the acceptance of media and materiality as dimensions of literary meaning is inevitable, no matter how long it has been delayed.

Robert Smith, where a jellyroll was served and enjoyed by all. Coverley’s Califiamoves to cybertext Aarsethand culminates in the “technotext,” Hayles’s term for literary works that self-reflexively engage with their own inscription technologies and integrate semiotic elements such as kineticism and navigational structures.

Tracing a journey from the s through the s, N. Other editions – View all Writing Machines N. Hayles’ brilliance and enthusiasm carry us through to the end, and even bring us back to poke around in the better passages.

Augusta Rohrbach rated it it was amazing Sep 11, Hayles concludes by speculating on how technotexts affect the development of contemporary subjectivity. What is really upsetting here is that we begin to wonder if Hayles is perhaps, by her sensibility, simply locked out of an understanding of poetics.

Hayles is thus central to the movement among digital scholars to instantiate the materiality of new media writing over and against the charge that it is ephemeral and limited to the dimensions of the screen. Tracing a journey from the s through the s, N.

No body of writing in the world is more relevant to what Hayles attempts in Writing Machines. Katherine Hayles No preview available – Theories of [End Page ] complexity and emergence constitute part of the frame of reference for Hayles on this point, but the concept also builds upon Espen Aarseth’s articulation of ergodic literature, texts that require significant bodily labor from the reader in order to bring them into being.

The author doesn’t just write these points, she also worked with a designer to make the book feel more like an experience than a “regular” book and to emphasize her points.


Writing Machines

The topics she discusses relate more to “how” we read, than to actually reading on a computer, although that is in there too. If you like books and love to build cool products, we may be looking for you.

Oct 01, Chris rated it really liked it Shelves: Cambridge and London,p. Nor is it surprising that one of the key texts macjines investigates is Tom Phillips’ A Humument [12], which so strongly recalls illuminated manuscripts. References to this book Writing new media: If Hayles can’t even pick up such signals in a relatively accessible work like A Humument I fear she will go on missing crucial contextual clues, and continue using the wrong tools for her job.

Ashley rated it it was ok Mar 10, Laura rated it it was ok Dec 02, Technical Communication Quarterly Alan G.

Katherine Hayles uses the autobiographical persona of Kaye to explore how literature has transformed She did not see a dial telephone until she left home for college; in Clarence she used the phone by cranking the ringer, whereupon Delores, the town operator, would answer and ask what number she wanted, no doubt continuing to listen in to catch the juicy bits.

Lindsey rated it it was amazing Aug 30, If so, she finds herself in a kind of Ancient Mariner scenario — thirsty, but unable to drink from the body of water her ship floats on. Due to their sturdiness, usefulness, and katherne particular virtues as knowledge-storing systems, books and print will be with us for quite a long time yet. Hayles performs herself as a remediated narrator, not only in that her consciousness is imbricated with the media that represents her, but also in that her development as a scholar and moments of illumination are inextricably linked to the development of a critical practice of digital textuality.

Weaving together Kaye’s pseudo-autobiographical narrative with a theorization of contemporary literature in media-specific terms, Hayles examines the ways wrihing which literary texts in every genre and period mutate as they are reconceived and rewritten for electronic formats.