Joseph Kosuth an American conceptual artist, lives in New York and London, after having . His seminal text ‘Art after Philosophy’, written in , had a major impact on the thinking about art at the time and has been seen since as a kind. 3. Art after Philosophy’. Joseph Kosuth. The fact that it has recently become fashionable for physicists themselves to be sympa~ theeic towards religion marks. Joseph Kosuth’s writings, like his installations, assert that art begins where mere physicality ends. The articles, statements, and interviews collected here.
|Published (Last):||16 February 2007|
|PDF File Size:||13.28 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||6.13 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Matias Monteiro pgilosophy it really liked it Feb philosophyy, Trivia About Art After Philoso Ayer 26 Here then I propose rests the viability of art. Ceci Lia rated it it was amazing May 30, Fine art has also, of course, become adept at using not just the language of advertising but also pop-culture more broadly, and in a much more complexly integrated way than it occurred in the work of an older generation — consider the work of Glasgow artists Beagles and Ramsey, for example, in comparison to Warhol.
Refresh and try again. Kosuth belongs to a broadly international generation of conceptual artists that began to emerge in the mids, stripping art of personal emotion, reducing it to nearly pure information or idea and joweph playing down the art object. Bethany Johnson rated it liked it Mar 29, The Best Books of If one is questioning the nature of painting, one cannot be questioning the nature of art.
Thus, judgments on what it looks like correspond to taste, and we can see that throughout history different examples of architecture are praised at different times depending on the aesthetics of particular epochs.
A few examples will point this out. Phiposophy current location of Modernist criticism began to seem far from the disinterested objective standpoint it had professed, as Kosuth claims of the critic Clement Greenberg:.
Joseph Kosuth – Wikipedia
Reinhardt describes, and Kosuth follows him in describing, a philosophical ideal wherein a given entity can be both subject and object of itself. The viewer who experiences the work, as well as the artist who makes it, cannot fail to have a history, experiences, memories and beliefs about things other than art.
Formalist criticism is no more than an analysis of the physical attributes of particular objects that happen to exist in a morphological context. His visual environment in the part of the world in which he lived was fairly consistent.
These words, like actual works of art, are little more than historical curiosities, but the concept becomes a machine that makes the art beneficial, modest, rustic, contiguous, and humble. We see now that the axioms of a geometry are simply definitions, and that the theorems of a geometry are simply the logical consequences of these definitions.
In his essay “Art after Philosophy” he argued that art is the continuation of philosophywhich he saw at an end. In Britain alone, consideration must be given to a plurality of traditions, all valid, and all followed within art practice — an Indo-European tradition, for example; an North African tradition, philosoohy West Indian tradition, a specific Islamic tradition, and so on.
Kosuth’s works are frequently self-referential. There is no sense, therefore, in asking which of the various geometries known to us are false and which are true.
U B U W E B :: Joseph Kosuth – Art After Philosophy
The works in this series took the form of photostat reproductions of dictionary definitions  of words such as “water”, “meaning”, and “idea”. However, the fact that Art After Philosophy does not reduce the term to an isolated state effectively means that the word retains its ability to exist as an idea of art as well as within a specific object or example. During this period he aftre maintained his academic interests. Art indeed exists for its phioosophy sake.
His activity has consistently explored the production and role of language and meaning within art.
How else can one account for, given his theories — if they have any logic to them at all — his disinterest in Frank Stella, Ad Reinhardt, and others applicable to his philosopht scheme? Thus, as Ayer has stated: One can easily sympathize with his desire to connect, say, Tiepolo with Jules Olitski.
One should never forget, however, that a historian loves history more than anything, even art. Another way of stating, in relation to art, what Ayer asserted about the analytic method in the context of language srt be the following: