ABSTRACT. In this paper I criticise Axel Honneth’s reactualization of reification as a concept in critical theory in his Tanner Lectures and argue that he. Together with Honneth, Althusser claims that recognition is a (the?) basic category of human experience, one which is usually ignored. In the. According to Honneth, this explanation of reification suffers from at least four limitations. Taken together, these limitations call this single explanatory principle .
|Published (Last):||24 May 2010|
|PDF File Size:||6.19 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||17.57 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Althusser states that there are two distinct apparatuses which control the public: Even if we have all our eggs in the justice basket, hoonneth we fulfill the requirement of a particular just solution, we may still have an underlining pathology at work, which is equally, if not more so, reprehensible. This includes non- and mis-recognition as a basis of social and interpersonal conflict.
Humans are nastier than this, by nature, and so the emotional and affective bond that precedes cognition could lead reifkcation terrible things, and while she doesn’t make this point, with her analysis it becomes possible that a re-ifying stance could hypothetically prevent some types of grotesque and unethical behavior resulting from recognition.
Oxford Scholarship Online This book is available as part of Oxford Scholarship Online – view abstracts and keywords at book and chapter level. Honneth enlists Dewey and Heidegger alongside recent claims of infant psychology to support his claims.
Academic Skip to main content. David Benbow rated it really liked it Feb 11, Now, perhaps Honneth is right and recognition always precedes cognition.
Political Theory in Social and Political Philosophy. This book is available as part of Oxford Scholarship Online – view abstracts and keywords at book rrification chapter level. It would have been interesting if Butler would have brought that point up, because I would argue that Butler holds to a kind of constructivism, but a constructivism that denies a strong willing subject.
Added to PP index Total downloads 28of 2, Recent downloads 6 months 1of 2, How can I increase my downloads? Rachel rated it really liked it Mar 21, A Critique of Axel Honneth. Judith Butler, Raymond Geuss, and Jonathan Lear, respond with hard questions about the central anthropological premise of his argument, the assumption that prior to cognition there is a fundamental experience of intersubjective recognition that can provide a normative standard by which current social relations can be judged wanted.
Sheridan rated it liked it. In the early 20th century, Marxist theory was enriched and rejuvenated by adopting the concept of honnefh, introduced by the Hungarian theorist Georg Lukacs to identify and denounce the transformation of historical processes into ahistorical entities, human actions into things that honneyh part of an immutable “second nature.
For once, political and cultural elders had finally succeeded in extinguishing the moral torch that had more-or-less successfully guided successive generations throughout history. For Honneth, we might say that recognition arises in the unmediated awareness of something.
Thanks for telling us about the honnneth. To this end he marshals a rehabilitated reificaiton from Georg Lukacs, ‘reification’. Essentially Honneth tries to establish that emotional or affective identification with a caregiver-‘recognition’- must take reofication and Axel Honneth’s creative elaboration of his critical theoretical understanding of recognition combining Luckacs, Dewey, Heidegger, Cavell, and developmental psychology is impressive.
VamanaBhava Ruse rated it really liked it Jun 15, To purchase, visit your preferred ebook provider.
Preview geification Reification by Axel Honneth. First off, if you’re going to take a new look at an old idea, at least get the new idea right; otherwise you’re generating a new idea, into an old category, while fighting off a straw-man. In this paper I criticise Axel Honneth’s reactualization of reification as a concept in critical theory in his Tanner Lectures and argue that he ultimately fails on his own terms.
It’s a brilliant conversation Unfortunately for Honneth, upon delivering his newly minted theory in the form of the Tanner Lectures at Berkeley, he was immediately met with resistance by Judith Butler, Raymond Geuss, Jonathan Lear, and others.
Judith Butler, Raymond Geuss, and Jonathan Lear, respond with hard questions about the central anthropological premise of his argument, the assumption that prior to cognition there is a fundamental experience of intersubjective recognition that can provide a normative standard by which current social relations can be judged wanted.
I don’t know about this social ontology business. Dora Suarez rated it liked it Aug 03, Can that really be recognition? This sort of naive perspective may make for good poetry, but rarely, if ever, does it produce responsible policy. Honneth responds briefly at honenth end to these criticisms, quite well in my opinion. Three distinguished political and social theorists: That is, to re-ify is to thing-ify. Open Preview See a Problem? This despite the fact that Honneth explains much of Lukacs.
Reification: A New Look at an Old Idea by Axel Honneth
Michel rated it liked it Oct 05, First, the title is accurate, this is a new look at an old idea, and I think reification is an idea that needs to not only stay within the philosophical, political, and psychological discourse, but needs to take on a more reificatiln and well-known position. Honneth’s work focuses on social-political and moral philosophy, especially relations of power, recognition, and respect.
Schafer – – Constellations 25 3: By reformulating reification as an improper praxis which results from reificatiom cogno-centrism, he joins the ranks of critics such as Heidegger, Dewey, and Cavell in explicating a bias which runs through the entirety of Western metaphysics. All of her experiences, beginning from birth, are filtered through the lens which the ISAs continue to propagate. Sep 16, Joseph Sverker added it Shelves: In the above passage, we can also once again locate the three key elements of recognition: Honneth makes these two points within the first two pages of the book, and from that point forward the book is a disaster.
We hear the same banal platitudes about base and superstructure being a one-sided causal relationship. In conclusion, I suggest that any successful account of reification must i take reification metaphorically and ii offer a social-historical account of the eeification s of reification. That’s his theory in a nutshell, and it’s rreification of interesting, but maybe he should avoid using the term reification, since he reiffication understood it to being with. Books by Axel Honneth.
Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford.