(i) In the case of Ex parte Boedel Steenkamp (3) SA (O) the testator bequeathed the residue of his estate in equal shares to his daughter and her. % aan niggie van testateur MMM STEENKAMP (geboortedatum / / ).” The joint restant van my boedel aan my familie vriendin MA RIEKERT tans woonagtig te Ex Parte Warren (4) SA (W). Theart v. Case law LPLP Law of Persons Cases. Ex parte Boedel Steenkamp. Facts: Testator left estate to his daughter and her children. At the time.
|Published (Last):||23 September 2015|
|PDF File Size:||13.5 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||8.22 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Thanks for give me this information really this product is very effective. Thanks you very much for this important information beodel really helps as a lot. Law of Persons Cases. Testator left estate to his daughter and her children. At the time that daughter was pregnant when the testator died. Should the nasciturus inherit? Yes, A child already conceived will be regarded as already bordel and will therefore inherit if psrte is subsequently born alive.
A women who was six months pregnant was involved in a motor car accident due to the negligent driving of another person, causing her child to be born with cerebral palsy. The court held that the nasciturus fiction has to apply so that he can claim for damages. Is the Act constitutional?
Yes, the Act was constitutional and women have the right to terminate pregnancies in accordance to act. A minor was pregnant and wanted to terminate her pregnancy. Whether she could have an abortion boedfl consent from her family. The court held that she could terminate her pregnancy according to the Choice on Termination of Pregnancy Act 92 ofas long as she was able to give her informed consent, which she did. A beneficiary to a will, had not been located in 15 years.
Should an application for a presumption of death succeed?
No, the court held that an application fro a presumption of death should be left to the discretion of the judge Roman-Dutchhence the period of absence of a person is not required to order a presumption of death. Should the application for a presumption of death be successful? No, however the court authorised the Master to distribute the money equally between the applicant and his siblings without the necessity of their providing security. The presumption of death is refused, because the evidence surrounding Mr.
Pieters death is not conclusive. Two applicants in a same sex life partnership, 2 nd applicant gave birth to twins via artificial insemination.
Is a child born due to artificial insemination legitimate? Yes, Children born as a consequence of artificial insemination are covered by the Children Status Act 82 oftherefore the child was legitimate. The applicant and the respondent met in Julyand from then on had sexual intercourse regularly.
Applicant claimed the respondent had another boyfriend.
Ex Parte Boedel Steenkamp
Can the court order an adult to submit to a blood test? Father of child wants a DNA test to be taken in order to prove paternity, but the mother refused. Should the mother and the child be boeel to take a DNA test? The appellant was the father of an extra-marital child. When the child was born the appellant and respondent were living together. In they stopped living together and the child lived with her mother.
Should the father have access to his extra-marital child?
Ex Parte Boedel Steenkamp – WikiVisually
Van Erk v Holmer. Applicant and respondent in a relationship from Feb Jan Whether father must be granted access to his illegitimate child? The respondent agreed that appellant could have access to his child. He approached the court for an order granting him access to his son, the application was dismissed in the court a quo but an appeal against this decision was successful.
Ex-girlfriend tried to give unborn child up for adoption. Fraser tried to stop adoption asking stteenkamp child to be given to him instead. Do both parents of an illegitimate child need to give consent to adoption? Petersen v Maintenance Officer. A single mother the applicantreceived inadequate maintenance contributions from the father of the beodel child, launched an application for an order directing the Maintenance Officer 1 st respondent to summon the paternal grandparents to the maintenance court to establish their ability to pay maintenance.
Government of South Africa V Grootboom. When evicted they applied to high court for an order requiring the govt. No, these 2 sections have to be read together.
According to s28 1 b of the constitution, envisages: The appellant minor entered into an ante nuptial contract without the necessary consent. Was the contract valid? Fx minor entered into a contract of lease with the appellant, and a cheque was issued to the appellant, but was dishonoured as payment had been stopped by the steenkaml. Posted by Mrs Calvino at Anatswanashe 29 December at Chimangadzo Donald 13 March at Atlegang Motsamai 21 March at Unknown 18 May at Newer Post Older Post Home.