AUGMENTING HUMAN INTELLECT: A Conceptual Framework NOTE: This paper by Douglas Engelbart lays out the theoretical foundations to his subsequent. Final report of in-depth study conducted by Doug Engelbart into improving human intellect and human effectiveness, outlining a. Douglas Engelbart: “Augmenting Human Intellect: A Conceptual Framework” Alberto Boem Interface Culture Master Course Kunstuniversität Linz.
|Published (Last):||8 April 2009|
|PDF File Size:||3.37 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||13.41 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
The fundamental goal of Engelbart’s research is to them better.
We refer to a way of life in an integrated domain where hunches, cut-and-try, intangibles, and the human feel for a situation usefully co-exist with powerful concepts, streamlined terminology and notation, sophisticated methods, and high-powered electronic aids. Papert’s Mindstorms is pretty good on this. Open Preview See a Problem? Enter the email address you signed up with and we’ll email you a reset link.
Lists with This Book. Capabilities Engelbart divides our augmented problem-solving capabilities up: Augmenting intellect with augmentlng and pencil What is x ? This paper is also seen by some historians as marking the genesis of ideas about computer networks which later blossomed into the Internet.
Human enhancement Neurohacking Simulated reality Transhumanism.
Augmenting Human Intellect: A Conceptual Framework
However the importance of Engelbart work lies in system involve primarly an augmented-user who must try to solve his vionary thinking of use networked computers to solve the a complex problem concerning his working field.
Or, at the augmentimg, some general principles governing behaviour? Be the first to ask a question about Augmenting Human Intellect. Andrew Cedotal marked it as to-read Aug himan, Can we find principles that will help us design more powerful human-machine systems?
Juan-Carlos Foust rated it really liked it Dec 30, Multimedia From Wagner to Virtual Reality, ed.
Engelbart: Augmenting Human Intellect ()
Tami Mitchell marked it as to-read May 04, Scrivener’s division into research and draft is only a small addition dougpas the basic capabilities.
The system that is described here — useful to us to indicate the purpose that he has set, because this is even it is a computer-based system – have a social structure, not important and clarifying to better understand the development of mechanical.
What are some other examples of small changes in basic capabilities that cause large changes in the repertoire hierarchy? IA is sometimes contrasted with AI artificial intelligencethat is, diuglas project of building a human-like intelligence in the form of infellect autonomous technological system such as a computer or robot. The author lists four types of interface. The creators of Scrivener have taken a process that formerly had to be done manually by writers, and built a system of cues that make it easy and natural.
A system like the one hjman, language and methodology . Omar marked it as to-read Nov 20, Very interesting how the revolutionary ideas of how we might augment our intellect and improve our productivity are actually just very boring basic word processing and other software tools that just aren’t even interesting or worth thinking sugmenting because we use them all the time without thinking of them.
Basic capabilities; The repertoire hierarchy of capabilities, built up from the basic capabilities. Mike Kovner marked it as to-read Jul 23, Engelbart reasoned that the state of our current technology controls our ability to manipulate information, and that fact in turn will control our ability to develop new, improved technologies.
By also concentrating on the repertoire hierarchy as an important object of study, we are alerted to the fact that even a tiny change to basic capabilities may propagate through the repertoire hierarchy to cause major changes in effective intellect.
For explain this world’s problems through boosting the capabilities of the human’s idea that we should not forget that at the time was revolutionary intellect. We offer the following hypothesis, which is related to the Whorfian hypothesis: This article needs additional citations for verification. Man-computer symbiosis is a subclass of man-machine systems. I take that to mean that Engelbart accomplished his goals, and it’s kind of exciting to think that we have already augmented ourselves – and will continue to do so.
Someone deeply committed with bad tools is often much more effective than someone uncommitted who has great tools. We Intelligence, society, individual, sharing, computer network, have to rember that the invention of the ‘mouse’ device starts from teamwork, complexity.
What would be some fun things to prototype? What is new is that we can now do it synthetically, consciously, deliberately. But what emerges from the reading of 4.
Reasoning about naming systems. This page was last edited on 27 Septemberat Trivia About Augmenting Human Brain transplant Cyborg Mind uploading. This division is a very clever move.
It’s not difficult for a writer with the right habits to do this manually. Published October by Stanford Research Institute. Because not only the intelligence resulting from a cooperation of individuals is greater than a single intelligence, but 6. We won’t attempt to grok the whole thing — indeed, I certainly don’t grok the whole thing. Engelbart viewed augmentation as being to a great extent about developing new ways of manipulating and structuring symbols:.