CSAT GPRA Client Outcome Measures Tool. File 1: CSAT_GPRA Client Outcome Measures File 2: CSAT_GPRA Client Outcome. HIV Open Data Project: CSAT GPRA Client Outcome Measures for Performance and Results Act (GPRA) to report program outcomes as a. HIV Open Data Project: CSAT GPRA Client Outcome Measures for Discretionary Programs. United States Department Of Health And Human Services.
|Published (Last):||12 January 2008|
|PDF File Size:||7.98 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||13.8 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
May 9, View help for published Principal Investigator s: Such positive correlations are evidence of construct validity.
A Simplified Method for Routine Outcome Monitoring after Drug Abuse Treatment
P print report on printer or screen d vsat delimited output file for use in excel. Client tracking and outcomes assessment by treatment staff At the start of this project, Community Reintegration follow-up was hampered by difficulty contacting clients.
After the third sample period, collateral correlation was analyzed see results section and it was determined that the graduate data was reliable. Table 4 presents the Spearman rank correlation coefficients r and significance levels p for these ten variables.
For those clients who complete the full program, two full-time staff are responsible for all aspects of discharge planning, community gpar follow-up, and the six-month routine outcome monitoring interview.
HIV Open Data Project: CSAT GPRA Client Outcome Measures for Discretionary Programs (ICPSR 34729)
Substance Abuse and Rehabilitation. These questions are in line with social-educational prevention and treatment dsat where vulnerability to relapse can be ameliorated by reducing key predictive risk factors 32 —one aim of a community reintegration component.
Initially, staff were allowed two weeks to obtain outcomes from both the client and a close relative or associate, for verification.
To verify self-reported measures gprs drug abuse, the first three sampling periods included data collected by both self-report and collateral family reports.
Key steps for obtaining meaningful outcomes included:. The significant correlations between the types of respondents range from a. Where client groups are heterogeneous and treatments are non-protocol driven, such as those found in many out-sourced or external EAPs, a facility-driven routine outcome monitoring effort could return useful data to the EAP.
Click apply to save the changes, then ok to close the printing preferences window. Although CSAT and other performance efforts require contact with all clients regardless of discharge reason, this first phase of developing a quality assurance system was confined only to those who completed the residential treatment plan.
Treatment center and staff feedback is also described. Analysis of recurrence of drug problems The analysis of drug use in the past 30 days from the total sample of respondents is presented in Table 5 as separate results for the total of all respondents, the subset of respondents who were graduates and the subset of respondents who were relatives. Find articles by Marie A.
Section i is completed by program staff about the client only at followup. This project was undertaken at the request of a program desiring to continuously improve treatment results including those that are not as expected.
Program factors and treatment outcomes in drug dependence treatment: Currently, treatment staff submit web-based data at three points in time: Research at Chestnut Health Systems shows that while telephone follow-up solely for organizational feedback does not appear to improve post-treatment outcomes, 15 15—20 minute telephone-based post-treatment counseling support can be an effective form of step-down treatment that increases engagement and sobriety while lowering relapse rates.
HIV Open Data Project: CSAT GPRA Client Outcome Measures for Discretionary Programs
Engaging treatment program staff in the process of monitoring their own outcomes and incorporating the data obtained into management decisions will likely lead to greater responsibility for improving treatment results. Table 2 Contact rates. Gpra intake, you may conduct a 6month gpra followup, and the client will be included in csats report to congress.
Aggregate data was used to improve program delivery and thereby post-treatment substance use and social outcomes. Three elements of feasibility are examined: This report shows the feasibility of a Routine Outcome Monitoring ROM system for use in drug abuse treatment facilities.
The Workplace Outcomes Suite WOS can detect statistically significant changes in absenteeism, presenteeism, work engagement, life satisfaction, and workplace distress over day follow-up periods, and with sample sizes as small as 50 clients.
Csat ta package assessing mental health to enhance services and outcomes. The analysis of drug use in the past 30 days from the total sample of respondents is presented in Table 5 as separate results for the total of all respondents, the subset of respondents who were graduates and the subset of respondents who were relatives. Methods Narconon International and Psychometric Technologies Incorporated collaborated to develop a scientifically grounded methodology that would result in data that would be useful to treatment providers.
The csat gpra tool collects information from your clients on a range of prescription medication. Table 3 presents the bivariate correlations between thirteen measures.
The re-entry plan is developed by: Ten items were thought to obtain clinically relevant information during a short telephone interaction. Feasible for use by individuals who have not been trained in research methods, this system provides timely feedback to clinicians who may need to intervene with individual cases and, with certain limitations, can contribute to larger, aggregate pools of data used by those involved in basic research, treatment policy and funding decisions.
Csat gpra client outcome measures for discretionary programs. Table 5 Gpa of drug-related problems.