“Computing Machinery and Intelligence” is a seminal paper written by Alan Turing on the topic of artificial intelligence. The paper, published in in Mind, . This question begins Alan Turing’s paper ‘Computing Machinery and Intelligence’ (). However he found the form of the question unhelpful. Computing machinery and intelligence A.M. Turing, MIND This is most certainly a classic paper. We’ve all heard of the ‘Turing Test,’ but.
|Published (Last):||9 August 2005|
|PDF File Size:||14.20 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||8.90 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
May not machines carry out something which ought to be described as thinking but which is very different from what a man does?
Intelligence is Not Enough: Thus, Turing rephrases his initial question: Clearly, a machine won’t learn in exactly the same way as a child Now Turing agrees with the second premise: Lady Lovelace’s Objection 1. You are commenting using your Twitter account. Aaron Sloman – unknown. Cimputing no animal or machine can think. To avoid the discussion degenerating into something to be settled by an opinion poll, Turing quickly refines it to nad more testable proposition.
For Turing, there seems to be no good argument other than to say that we need to wait and see what will happen in 50 years. Find it on Scholar. These questions replace our original, “Can machines think?
Computing machinery and intelligence
He extends on this thought by an analogy to an atomic pile of less than critical size which is to be considered the machine and an injected idea is to correspond to a neutron entering the pile from outside the pile; the neutron will cause a certain disturbance which eventually dies away. The consequences of machines thinking would be too dreadful.
Turing argues that only the digital computer should be able to participate. The problem is mainly one of programming, rather than a engineering or data storage problem. Ikegami – – Minds and Machines 14 2: Naturally they conclude this is true of all machines.
Plus, the writing style is a delight.
Alan M. Turing, Computing machinery and intelligence – PhilPapers
Twitter LinkedIn Email Print. A systematic method has the disadvantage that there may be an enormous block without any solutions in the region copmuting has to be investigated first.
Opinions may vary as to the complexity which is suitable in the child machine. Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Dale Jacquette – – Behavior and Philosophy 20 Can the interrogator tell the difference between human and machine?
Mind Perception and the Uncanny Valley. A smallish proportion are supercritical. Errors of functioning 1. On the Socialization of Talking Machines. Turing defined a digital computer as having: Saul Traiger – – Minds and Computibg 10 4: In one sits a man A and a woman B.
Argument from Consciousness Argument: Retrieved from ” https: Given this process he asks whether it would be more appropriate to program a child’s mind instead of an adults mind and then subject the child mind to a period of education.
This question avoids the difficult philosophical problem of pre-defining the verb “to think” and focuses instead on the performance capacities that being able to think makes possible, and how a causal system can generate them.
In critiquing his new problem, Turing was satisfied with the clear line drawn between physical and intellectual capacities of humans by the separation of rooms and use of written communication. Who’s Afraid of the Turing Test? Words, thoughts, and theories. By posing questions in typewritten form to the two participants, the interrogator must try to a.m.huring which of the two is the woman.
One may hope, however, that this process will be more expeditious than evolution.
Computing machinery and intelligence | the morning paper