Post-structuralism. A Very Short Introduction. October , What is Catherine Belsey is a post-structuralist herself. She writes the book in a . Poststructuralism: A Very Short Introduction traces the key arguments that have Catherine Belsey, author Chair of the Centre for Critical and Cultural Theory at. Poststructuralism: A Very Short Introduction by Catherine Belsey, , available at Book Depository with free delivery worldwide.
|Genre:||Health and Food|
|Published (Last):||20 December 2011|
|PDF File Size:||17.45 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||7.66 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Or is it psychoanalysis? See what takes your fancy, and catherlne you can pursue those lines of enquiry yourself to read further. These arguments are particularly interesting in light of American constitutional law and politics. Dispatched from the UK in 3 business days When will my order arrive? Saussure’s concept of signifier is the basis of differance not difference guiding the idea of a world without foundation truths.
I don’t believe anyone who says they find it easy. Front Matter List of illustrations 1. Derrida contended that the further down the meaning hole you go, the less meaning you will find. Post-Structuralism and poststruturalism Question of History. The mother is not a person, but a structural position. According to structuralists, we tend to naively relate to our experience as primary, and the langue we use to describe our experiences as secondary.
There was a heavy emphasis on Psychoanalysis and Lit theory which was disappointing as I hoped there would be more anthropologists. Nevertheless a usefu This introduction to post-structuralism starts with the structuralism of Saussure and therefore with linguistics. Preview — Poststructuralism by Catherine Belsey. The deconstructavist approach entails smashing texts into bits and seeing where the meaning is. Jun 14, Valie rated it really liked it. A Glossary of Feminist Theory.
Structuralism and Poststructuralism for Beginners. The fundamental question at the heart of both structuralism and poststructuralism is: Following a brief account of the historical relationship between structuralism and poststructuralism, this Very Short Introduction traces the key arguments that have led poststructuralists to challenge traditional theories of language and culture.
Poststructuralism: A Very Short Introduction
And it sort of worked. Jan 26, Nathan rated it really liked it. Several times, I found myself spending three, four, five minutes trying to unpack a single dense sentence. However, I think that Belsey does a good job in introducing poststructuralism.
They all critiqued aspects of structuralism and were vrry to comprise poststructuralism’s pantheon of heavyosity, although many of them rejected the moniker. That is the question of XXI century: Written by experts for the newcomer, they demonstrate the finest contemporary thinking about the central problems and issues in hundreds of key topics, from philosophy to Freud, quantum theory to Islam.
Feb 15, Jimmie rated it it was ok.
Overall, the book was an easy read and probably just as good as spending a couple hours on wikipedia to build a strong base of knowledge. Poststructuralism is a response to structuralism, which is an intellectual movement arguing that human culture may be understood by means of a structure that differs from reality and abstract ideas.
Human beings remain human beings, regardless of whether their values come from language or from the ether. Novelty of the theory was one too. I’m very interested in the vin diagram zone of overlap between the humanities and the social sciences. I’ve skirted around PS in its different forms for a while now, when dabbling in semiotics and critical theory etc, and really wanted to know a little more about ‘what it’s all about’ without burdening myself with a loaded textbook.
Catherine Belsey, Post-Structuralism: A Very Short Introduction – PhilPapers
Oh wait, it’s popular culture. Post structuralism doesn’t deprive us of the power to change. I will probably revisit this book a year or so from now because I’ve found that these books are great at connecting very general themes one may miss in the complexity of it all.
Of course one can’t give a complete overview in pages and there is some dumbing down going on. She elucidates the works of Saussure, Derrida, Foucault, and Lacan, among others. Jurisprudence shrt Philosophy of Law. That particular example -Prince- was so arbitrary in fact, that the dude switched signifiers in mid career, from a word -Prince- to a freaky gender fucked squiggle, and implored us to refer to him as ‘the artist formerly known as Prince.