Home Rene Lourau Analisis Institucional (Biblioteca de Sociologia) (Spanish Stock Image. Analisis Institucional (Biblioteca de Sociologia) (Spanish Edition). QR code for Análisis institucional y socioanálisis. Title, Análisis institucional y socioanálisis. Contributor, René Lourau. Publisher, Nueva Imagen, Tercera, el cambio institucional ha sido no sólo continuo, sino inusualmente dicha teoría considera al individuo como la unidad básica de análisis y, por el otro, . “elemento objetivo del sistema jurídico” de Hauriou (Lourau, 9, 62).

Author: Molkis Dikus
Country: Austria
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Business
Published (Last): 26 November 2009
Pages: 397
PDF File Size: 2.54 Mb
ePub File Size: 15.3 Mb
ISBN: 860-8-79795-231-9
Downloads: 69016
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Taum

These can be read, felt, understood, in a variety of ways, not by a voluntarism, but by the enchainment of logics present both in the act in question and in its reworking in the field diary.

That is, social fact has coercive functions on individual initiatives, because it is outside people’s consciousness, according to “a set of rules and determining what is right or wrong, allowed or prohibited”p. The volatility of chance frightens those who intend, with their knowledge or in the process of building their knowledge, to have certainty that the paths are rebuilt with the acuity of a researcher who will know how to read the clues.

With tears in her eyes, a children’s teacher reads in her field diary the scene that destabilized her: In it, the professional doing is rebuilt not by accusations of failure, but by possible displacements in the exercise of collective thinking. Paradoxes between the analysis and the criticism The field diary is a technical instrument that produces an intervention in the reality in question by problematizing both what is called analysis and how it should be done.

This article presents some analyses of intervention practices carried out in schools and tutorial councils, taking two references as methodological basis: It never precedes our gaze, because it is the effect instituciojal it.

Foucault understands truth as a relation of power, differing from the act of looking at truth as something to be discovered and accepted, insofar as truth responds to a set of rules and procedures, which produce loudau.

Interrogations are the right tool of a field diary, the good company in a formation by keeping alive the thinking and the research as professional practices that do not exhaust and do not cease to make learning.

By weaving practices and our look at them, that is, how we construct reality, an interrogation emerges to be worked out by shifting our experience of the patterns of truth and by opening ourselves lourua recognizing multiple prisms to deal with relationships.

The writing of the diary allows surprises, insurgencies and invites not to write about reality but to interrogate it. To build an intervention from the institutional analysis is to produce an unstable and open field of analysis, which operates through the institutions crossed by it. It is up to the socioanalytic analisiw to conduct the analysis process, making sure that the displacements detach themselves from the identity perspective.


The experience is not a mistake or an accomplishment and makes us think, exchange ideas, lead a collective movement to build other possibilities. A creative dimension leads the diary and that, just before giving security, can scare.

To carry out in-depth analysis is to search for the logics, for the senses that support the doing, saying, feeling and desiring, that guides the way we understand the experiences that cross us. In this abyss the diary projects us when converted into an apprenticeship committed to thinking and feeling.

ANÁLISIS INSTITUCIONAL by Maritza Valdez on Prezi

lourwu Thus, when intervening in the tutelary council it is necessary to think of it as an institution that has a history and movements that escape the boundaries of the place and the space-time condition of the establishment.

Paradoxes between the analysis and the criticism. Objectivity as a counterpoint to subjective production is the separation between act and affection, summoned in front of a record of something distant, cold, technical, inconceivable when the ways of perceiving lead to the record written or not of an act.

For the latter, every act-fact is always reality in movement, being made and embodied by the analysis. Among them, the one taken as an archaeological meaning can innstitucional to think the work with the field diary, because it aims at the traces of historical and discursive novelties that seek the regularity of practices, distancing themselves from the concept of social fact – as proposed by Durkheim.

For example, intervening in a tutelary council implies thinking about the actions that take place in the encounter with the different forces, relationships and beliefs that build this territory.

The analysis, which is based on the socio-analytical references, requires an exercise of thinking about the problems, the implications, understanding how they constitute us and lead our action.

When discussing the written and oral records of practices in the intervention fields during the internship supervisions, it is difficult for those who narrate their experiences to depart from the logic of judgment, since the debate that is built up in the collective may suggest that the performance in the presented event could have been in many other ways.

Analyzing each perception, shuddering truths, is a bet in the understanding of the logics that sustains the practices read by our gaze, institucioonal judging their truth or qualifying the agreements.

Never-ending movements, never pre-defined, under the domain of chance, “as the ever-renewed risk of the will to power which, in order to control it, opposes the risk of even greater chance” Foucault,p.

The urgent character that characterizes the work of many establishments, given by rushed routines and the lack of conditions for more careful procedures, contrasts with the practice of thinking provoked by the writing of the field diary. All between and Its wealth is not in teaching to do right or better, since the performance can always be another, since life is intensity and chance.


Namely, it is usually the first interview, the first contact, the speech of the first attended in each case that holds true as the story that has real force. The implication analysis refuses the analysts’ neutrality. It is not a matter of recording successes, ajalisis and deviations, in a proposal of self-criticism, but of thinking that every practice is a production to be thought of not as an inevitable act, nor an act to be corrected, but as an event that occurs in an enchainment of meanings.

As discussed by Coimbra and Nascimento”the implications analysis brings to the field of analysis feelings, perceptions, actions, events hitherto considered negative or strange, as deviations and errors Next, the mother ajalisis to the board demanding the child back.

What sustains a field diary that operates by analysis implication is the debate about the production of truth. In other words, the intervention must consider that the practices of the tutelary council are impregnated with the movements instituted by the public policies directed at children insyitucional adolescents, by institutions such as school, religion, developmental psychology and others, by legislation that affirms the protection of the juvenile population, among other forces that take place in the council’s daily life.

When a mother is judged by both the school staff and the tutelary council for not being in time to pick up her children because she stayed home watching television, a certainty is given: The process necessary to deconstruct the prisons of the instituted is long, demanding from us the reinvention through practices of intervention to think what is fixed and naturalized in the world. Como citar este artigo.

VIAF ID: 39380485 (Personal)

All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Analiisis Attribution License. In this field of possibilities, the supervision routes the analysis of what is recorded in the diary, highlighting, even, the displacements that this instrument causes from what happened.

In this way, it shows that in the midst of the truths considered absolute – the instituted – there are gaps, experiments that are not yet palpable, which causes differences: Therefore, the implication analysis is a permanent process of denaturalization of institutions.

Institutional analysis as a method of intervention acts as a strangeness to what is institutionalized, affirming that in this process there are two movements: From this perspective, the exercise lourqu writing problematizes how we affect ourselves, our strangeness and difficulties, allowing us to stir up the analusis.